Danny Bow – Unspeakable
Broken Beat, Downbeat & Downtempo, Hip Hop, Instrumental, Plagiarism //
By: SimonVB //
03/05/2012 //
13 Comments
I love netlabel culture. One of the reasons for this is because talented artists put a lot of time and effort into creating their work, which they distribute for free. I’ll say that again: netlabel culture thrives on hard work and generosity.
Art is an important part of the oil that keeps the machinery of our daily lives running. It’s a sense of wonder that does not just come natural, but requires a fair bit of effort to keep going. That’s why I become infuriated when I see people take these ideals, twist and distort them or even throw them out of the window altogether. One of these who has been at it for quite some time now is Danny Bow. I’m writing this review because I feel there is something fundamentally wrong with his releases.
From the Export Label website:
“This newest release is a continuation of the creative path he took in 2010 with the album ‘Frozen Memories’. Back then it was his first release under a new alias and with a new approach to composing and creating original music. The new album, entitled ‘Unspeakable’, on the one hand confirms these creative choices, on the other it elaborates on them.”
Now here’s how to read between the lines here. ‘Frozen Memories’ was a shameful collection of plagiarized material. ‘Unspeakable’ shows that Danny Bow continues ripping off well-known artists and presenting the material as his own.
Export Label continues:
“The material is entirely instrumental, with a few tracks enriched with vocal samples and dialogues. The sound of piano, which is the leitmotif of the album, has already become Danny Bow’s trademark.”
Calling the piano his trademark is a bit misleading, as that’s basically the only thing he did himself. Almost every track is built from large chunks of music he has stolen from other artists. And not the smallest ones at that. Now these are some very serious claims. Allow me to back up my argument.
I first got a nagging suspicion when I was listening to ‘Frozen Memories’ on my iPod and thought I had it on shuffle, as I recognized one of the songs. Upon looking, however, this didn’t seem to be the case. I was sure I had heard a lot of parts before, but when I came to track no.7 “Different Life” I was instantly certain this was a rip-off. The track used the entire string section from The Cinematic Orchestra’s ‘All things to All Men’. Hold on there, mister reviewer, isn’t that just called sampling? Well, what is sampling? You take a short snippet of sound from whatever source (another release, a movie, a radio-programme,etc.) and use this as a part of a new composition. The shorter the snippet and the more creative you are in putting it to a new use, the better the sampling and the more this can be considered art. Squarepusher’s endless restructuring of the amen break is something so unlike the original it can hardly even be called sampling anymore. The artist has created something entirely his own, with building blocks provided by somebody else.
If, however, the building blocks you “borrow” from other artists become longer, you run the risk of actually using their hard work as a base for your composition. This isn’t sampling. This is plagiarism. Danny Bow takes this one step further and just “samples” several long parts from one song, speeds them up or slows them down a little bit and puts a new beat underneath this. The string section from “Different life” is definitely too long to be called sampling in my opinion.
Then there’s the song called ‘Lonley Traveller’ [sic]. I’m sure I’ve heard this before, and thought it was something either by Kruder and Dorfmeister or Thievery Corporation, but I can’t figure out what it is. Perhaps some of our readers can? I have similar doubts about ‘Anger’.
I have no doubts at all about ‘Nine Tears’, though. This shameless rip-off of ‘Lamb – I cry’ is not sampling. Why? Lamb is largely defined by the vocal characteristics of their singer. You can’t just borrow that voice, her specific sound and incorporate that in your own songs.
With this background I listened to ‘Unspeakable’, hoping that I would be wrong. I was, unfortunately, not. The artists copied in this release are even easier to spot than in the last one. Track no.7 ‘God Sin’ copies both piano parts and vocals from ‘Tori Amos – Spring Haze’. The following track ‘Afternoon’ copies the entire (!) iconic riff from ‘Dire Straits – Money for Nothing’. As with Lamb’s vocals, the more defining a piece of music for the original, the less right you have to sample it and call this “creative”.
Track no.13 ‘Seven Town’ is stealing from ‘Tori Amos – Little Amsterdam’. Danny Bow’s fatigue is showing as he can’t even be bothered to steal from a different artist any more. The cherry on his plagiarism-pie comes with track no.15: ‘You’. Here, he just sped up the entire song ‘Dido – Who Makes You Feel’, and slapped one short loop over it. It took me 10 seconds to emulate this brazen theft. Literally. Done. New Song.
These are only the songs I have recognized, and I’m not that well-versed in the more classic pantheon of great music past and present. I’m sure many of you will find even more. Add this to spelling mistakes in track titles (on both ‘Frozen Memories’ and ‘Unspeakable’) and it shows these ‘releases’ are hastily slapped together pieces of grand theft music. What’s even more disturbing is that he is doing this with signed artists, basically endangering the creative commons label. Had this release been marketed as a collection of remixes, that would have been a completely different story. Claiming them as your own material is the lowest of the low.
Export Label’s motto is the following:
“We all work out of passion for good music and true art, and the need to create something new, original, fresh and, more than anything, our own. We do it to counteract the omnipresent mediocrity and banality.”
While this was true for some of their excellent earlier releases, it’s a cynical insult when paired with their latest. Don’t get me wrong. I like Export Label. I really do. While they might occasionally put out some work that is below the very high standards they have set with releases like ‘Blossom- Blue Balloons’, they have provided us with some really, really good music in the past. They also show that netlabels aren’t just an online entity, organizing live events that feature several of their artists. This is something other netlabels should do as well.
I believe there’s too much faceless flaming on the internet as it is, but for all of Export Label’s hard work, I just can’t let this pass unnoticed. This has not been easy to write for me. I do not enjoy talking in such strong terms about other people’s work. If I don’t like it, I try to be constructive. But this review is not even talking about Danny Bow’s work. It’s about how he steals from other people’s work. There’s not much work involved in speeding up some samples and then slapping a drum beat on that. It’s pure plagiarism and consequently, I feel like both ‘Unspeakable’ and ‘Frozen Memories’ are an insult to the hard work and dedication of the entire netlabel scene.
Danny Bow – You (or actually: Dido – Who Makes You Feel)
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Deep Link to the Release Page
Danny Bow - Unspeakable,
Send to Kindle
lovely review simon! fiery indeed, and deservedly so…
my general rule of thumb is that sampling and manipulating audio is ok, as it is just data, however if you sample the *essence* of a track and don’t cite it, you are calling someone else’s work your own.
Well put there sir. No doubt about it. These are covers, not new songs, and to represent them any other way would indeed have to be considered “plagiarism”.
Good to read another article about the misuse of musical material. Though your definition of sampling is either false or not entirely accurate. Sampling a piece of music or sound which is the work of another artist of which one doesn’t own the necessary rights is entirely forbidden! Yet, there is a legal grey area by which the sampled material has to be either “recognizable” parts or parts that work as the foundation of your work and this has to be proofed. At court it furthermore depends on the subjective assessment of a judge to either declare the sample recognizable or as the foundation of your work at last. So your lawyers work would be to convince him. Therefore and due to the fact that a judge is not a musical expert the final decision of the court can be quite confusing although the misuse of copyrighted material might be very obvious. Also if you use such material in your work but doesn’t use it for commercial purposes such as selling it, you won’t have to fear any consequences but such articles as this one at all. And that might be a negative side effect out of several disadvantages of Netlabelism in defiance all the positive ones.
The Winstons (authors of the “Amen Break”) went to court because they didn’t want to accept that several musical genres and an entire industry of selling sample backs build up on their drum break and they won’t get a nickel for it. Fortunately they lost due to that mentioned grey area. Otherwise even Squarepusher and everyone else would have been sued… A horrible scenario but The Winstons deserve more than just respect for their drum break!
Statement
In view of the fact that the media allegations of plagiarism made against a number of tracks on Danny Bow’s album have turned out to be true, the Export Label team has decided to remove the material from the label’s listing. This decision has been made due to the questionable artistic and creative value of „Unspeakable”. It is a serious moral shortcoming on Danny Bow’s part, in no way consistent with the policy of Export Label.
We extend our apologies to our listeners and fans as well as all organizations cooperating with us on a regular basis (news services, radio stations, media patrons) for this unfortunate situation.
We would like to inform you that the album ”Unspeakable” will still be available online (on social networking and music sites), however, Export Label has withdrawn from the distribution of the above mentioned material. It will no longer carry our label’s logo.
We would also like to assure you that we will go to any lengths to avoid similar errors in the future, and to make sure our releases meet the highest artistic standards, and never give rise to any such suspicion.
Not much information can be found about Danny Bow himself. He seems to be able to compile and “make” music that people enjoy listening to.
I think what this comes down to is just inexperience. Inexperience cannot defend plagiarism but I think it will be just a phase with Danny as he learns how to make and produce original material.
Being called out on his plagiarism could actually do some good for Danny if he’s got some balls because it could be turned into some great motivation to be make original music and dispel the critics.
Argh! I follow this feed to find new music worth checking out. I consider posts recommendations of the reviewers. Instead of reading the reviews, I usually just click through to the streams because 5 seconds of streaming tells me more than 200 words.
Next time you review something that is a copyright violation like this, please make a big fat warning. Please!
Hi Marc,
You bring up an interesting conundrum. Should we as a magazine only review things which we think are great pieces of music? Or should we just make a random selection of new releases and review those? We’ve always tended to adhere more to the former than the latter way of doing things, but sometimes we do just pick random releases. So while appearing in the magazine *might* be a sign that a reviewer recommends a certain release, this isn’t always the case.
As to your second remark. We did put up a warning. We created the blog category “plagiarism” for this release, and even that felt like it was kicking a man after he’d gone down. While we don’t approve of Danny Bow’s actions on ‘Unspeakable’ and ‘Frozen Memories’, we would like to do this unpleasant work with at least some dignity. Don’t expect us to go writing PLAGIARISM in caps lock in a review title, we simply won’t do that. While we understand a lot of our readers have busy schedules and just play the preview track, the rest of the review text is there for a reason. All the info you want about the release should be there.
Lonley Traveller is a rip off of a Royksopp song. I’m nearly convinced of it and it’s plaguing me that I can’t figure out which one.
figured it out. It’s She’s So on Melody A.M.
Thank you! I had given up on finding out what it was :) Thanks for letting us know
it’s a pleasure to be of assistance.
“Unbelieveble Feelings” is clearly using “Science and Religion” by Hans Zimmer (Angels and Demons OST).
Fairly happy to read I’m not out of my mind.
Old Me from Frozen Memories is also from a Cinematic Orchestra song, Burn Out (or Awakening of a Woman). I love some tracks of Danny Bow such as Heartlock and Save Me. But I cannot stand hearing this song (Old Me) made of a huge sample which totally reminds me the original song, which uses the essence or the main building block of the original song.